The formality of jointly signing the treaty is the culmination of their negotiations and does not Strategic decision making in the cuban the move-countermove process that preceded the signing. Long-Term Goals Long-term goals are the concrete embodiment of your mission and vision.
Krushchev, the Soviet prime minister, thought a deployment in Cuba would double the Soviet strategic arsenal and provide a real deterrent to a potential U. Rule 5 termination rule says when a player will not move from an initial state. The nature of the case was such that the use of evaluative frameworks and concepts along with the right managerial attitudes eventuated in a successful strategic outcome.
When this happens, the game terminates in a final state, which is the outcome of the game. If the Soviets maintained their missiles, the United States preferred an air strike to the blockade.
Below are some examples from my personal life. They move precisely because they calculate that they can do better by switching strategies, anticipating a better outcome when the move-countermove process finally comes to rest.
The elimination of the missiles would have to be done in such a way so that other nations were not alienated and be inclined to move into the Communist camp. The instability of outcomes in Alternative can most easily be seen by examining the cycle of preferences, indicated by the arrows going in a clockwise direction in this game.
The Cuban missile crisis is the most well known case of strategic decision making at the level of the nation-state. But the game tree continually changed with each development in the crisis. In my opinion, the most difficult concept to understand is the concept of marginal cost.
Finally, it is well known that several of President Kennedy's advisers felt very reluctant about initiating an attack against Cuba without exhausting less belligerent courses of action that might bring about the removal of the missiles with less risk and greater sensitivity to American ideals and values.
In real-life competition, are they going to be satisfied with the result that nobody wins or lose? By clarifying your company's big picture aims, you'll have the opportunity to align your shorter term plans with this deeper, broader mission -- giving your operations clarity and consistency.
It is precisely these negotiations, and the calculations underlying them, that TOM is designed to uncover. Rules of Play Play starts at an initial state, given at the intersection of the row and column of a payoff matrix.
The Soviet decision to install missiles in Cuba was strategic in many areas, but one area that is often overlooked was the political advantages that the Soviets would gain.
This model underlined the need for secrecy, decisiveness in policy making, speed and an extraordinary degree of liquidity in the flow of information to and from the White House. The nature of the case was such that the use of evaluative frameworks and concepts along with the right managerial attitudes eventuated in a successful strategic outcome.
Player 2 P2 can respond by unilaterally switching its strategy, thereby moving the game to a new state. By contrast, what remained more or less constant was the configuration of payoffs of Alternative, though where the players were in the matrix changed.
In April the Soviets began supplying Cuba with military arms in the form of surface-to-air missiles and surface-to-surface cruiser missiles, and later, sometime during the spring ofthe Soviets began to install nuclear missiles in Cuba.
The air strike was to be implemented following the blockade on October 23, On top of this is the fact that other Latin American countries might see the benefit of having Soviet arms in their country to deter invasions and the Soviets would gain even more strategic military superiority over the United States Harrison, Precedence Rule If it is rational for one player to move and the other player not to move from the initial state, the move takes precedence: In order to implement the best strategic decision, the United States, under the command of John F Kennedy, formed the Executive Committee, whose role was to manage the crisis.
For every day that the United States did not act, the Soviets became closer to completing the missile sites with nuclear capability and in turn closer to obtaining a strategic military advantage over the United States.
But in many real-life games, payoffs cannot easily be quantified and summed across the states visited. It turns out that 3,3 is a "nonmyopic equilibrium" in both games, and uniquely so in Alternative, according to the theory of moves TOM.
To be sure, game theory allows for this kind of thinking through the analysis of "game trees," where the sequential choices of players over time are described. At the time, the U. Despite the immediacy and urgency of these goals, your strategic decision-making process should still enable you to proceed with an eye toward both your vision and your longer term objectives.
Rule l differs drastically from the corresponding rule of play in standard game theory, in which players simultaneously choose strategies in a matrix game that determines its outcome.
A vision is an idea, and long-term goals are expressions of how these ideas play out -- with milestones and real-world objectives. We had an obligation to do everything in our power to protect Cuba's existence as a Socialist country and as a working example to the other countries in Latin America If the nuclear complexes were to be completed, Soviet leverage over other international matters, such as Berlin, would be improved.
Note that the sequence of moves and countermoves is strictly alternating: By postulating that players think ahead not just to the immediate consequences of making moves, but also to the consequences of countermoves to these moves, counter-countermoves, and so on, TOM extends the strategic analysis of conflict into the more distant future.
The elimination of the missiles would have to be done in such a way so that other nations were not alienated and be inclined to move into the Communist camp. If the nuclear complexes were to be completed, Soviet leverage over other international matters, such as Berlin, would be improved.dential decision making at a time of supreme national danger.
It offers policymakers and students of history unique insights into the interplay between the debates in the. Cuban Missile Crisis Decision Making. Print Reference this. Disclaimer: The action is chosen as a calculated solution to a strategic problem; In the Cuban missile crisis, The decision making process reflected the small group model.
The decision was solely made by the EXCOMM and the president. Strategic decision success is heavily reliant on the attitudes that managers take toward the decision-making process and toward the decision itself.
The Cuban missile crisis is the most well known case of strategic decision making at the level of the nation-state. The nature of the case was such. KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT Game Theory and Strategic Decision-Making DECS Professor Bob Weber Week #3 "The final lesson of the Cuban missile crisis is.
This is important as strategic decision-making lies at the very heart of strategy making. A business strategy is about decision-making through all the options available that will lead a business to a shiny direction and steps it will take to achieve its goals.
Nov 21, · Strategic decision success is heavily reliant on the attitudes that managers take toward the decision-making process and toward the decision itself. The Cuban missile crisis The Cuban .Download